Learn

Anamorphic squeeze,
explained

1.33× – 2× · WIDESCREEN FRAME · OVAL BOKEH · HORIZONTAL FLARES

See the squeeze in the simulator

Anamorphic is the look of cinema — wide 2.4:1 frames, oval bokeh, streak flares. Under the hood it's one idea: the lens squeezes a wider horizontal view onto your sensor, and you stretch it back out in post. The "squeeze factor" is how much it compresses.

How it works

A normal (spherical) lens projects the world at its true proportions. An anamorphic lens has cylindrical elements that compress the image horizontally — so more scene fits across the same sensor width. That footage looks tall and thin straight out of camera; in editing you desqueeze it by the squeeze factor to get a wide, correctly-proportioned frame.

horizontal field of view = spherical FOV × squeeze factor

focalcomp models this exactly: pick an anamorphic lens and the simulator locks the squeeze and shows the desqueezed display aspect in the readout.

The squeeze factors
SqueezeDesqueezed from 16:9Best sensorCharacter
1.33× →2.37:1MFT · APS-CSubtle, easiest
1.5×2.66:1APS-C · full frameStronger, balanced
1.6× →2.84:1Full frame · open gateWide, modern
2.0× →3.55:1 (from 4:3 open gate)Open-gate 4:3Classic Hollywood scope
Why the "look"

The same cylindrical elements that squeeze the image also do two beloved things: they stretch out-of-focus highlights into ovals, and streak bright point-sources into long horizontal flares. Those aren't lens flaws — they're the anamorphic signature, and they're baked in at capture, not added in post.

What to buy

Real anamorphic is finally affordable. Our guide ranks the best glass under $1,000 — from the lens that democratized the format to the first autofocus anamorphic.

Best anamorphic lenses under $1,000
Common questions

Do I desqueeze in camera or in post?

Most cameras offer a desqueeze preview so the monitor looks right, but the recorded file is still squeezed — you desqueeze for real in your NLE by setting the clip's pixel aspect to the squeeze factor.

Why do I need an open-gate or 4:3 sensor for 2×?

A 2× lens squeezes so much horizontally that you need extra sensor height (a 4:3 or open-gate mode) to end up with a normal widescreen frame after desqueezing. On a 16:9 sensor a 2× ends up extremely wide and wastes resolution.

Is anamorphic worth the hassle?

It's more demanding — manual focus is trickier, and you lose a bit of light and sharpness. But nothing else gives that frame and texture in-camera. Start with a forgiving 1.33× and decide from there.

Keep learning